Kerensky handed over power to the Bolsheviks Essay -- Russia Bolshevik

Kerensky turn over power to the BolsheviksBy October 1917 the Winter Palace of St Petersburg was overthrown by the Bolshevik party of Russia. Historians have deliberated for years on why this consequence occurred, one viewpoint taken is it was the fault of the detested Alexander Kerensky, prime-minister of Russia. Accusations that Kerensky handed power to the Bolsheviks are not unfounded, he conducted some disastrous policies, precisely was this Kerenskys fault, or was he being pressured by the unruly monarchists and powerfulists of Russia, did fear of a bloody cout d?tat force him into passing measures such as the restoration of the death penalty? Was Kerenskys failure inevitable after the dispirited spells of Lvov and Milyukov as leaders of the Provisional government? It is too easy to evoke that the revolution in Russia was one mans fault, despite Kerenskys perpetual mistakes there were a lot of other factors, such as the role of Trotsky and Lenin that must be taken into acc ount. An indelible failure of Alexander Kerensky was his refusal to bring Russia out of the war. Kerensky had been engage as Lvov successor due to his belligerent and aggressive nature against the Bolsheviks so his continuation of the war was not unexpected (especi in ally coming from the position look of War). However Kerensky was quite arrogant in thinking that a war that had brought down the Romanov dynasty of over 300 years and saw the dismissal of Milyukov and Guchov (after they embarrassingly promised to carry on with the war effort after telling the good deal they would not) would not hinder his leadership. The burden of the war on the people was annihilative as resources were being sent to the front also troops at the rear were becoming increasingly frustrat... ...ro to solve them, the war was straining all their resources, the workers were in constant rebellion and the army were no longer nether the Provisional Government?s control, also the polarisation of political Russia was worrying. Kerensky came to be a leader because he was a bridge between the right and left, save that bridge burned and Kerensky was left alone with no support. His intervention of the Kornilov affair was his biggest downfall, personally I think he should have never appointed Kornilov as Command in Chief, he was reactionary and had a past record of disregarding rules, Brusilov was a better option because of his elected appeal. When Kornilov came into the picture the left support of Kerensky disappeared as well as the right, at this moment the Provisional Government was over. Kerensky didn?t give the Bolsheviks power but made it exceedingly easy for them.