Brian Clarks Play Whose Life Is It Anyway? Essay -- Brian Clark Whose

Brian Clarks Play Whose Life Is It Anyway?The play Whose Life Is It Anyway by Brian Clark was do into a stageplay and film. The television system play was made in 1972 and the stageplays in 1978. In the play, written by Brian Clarke, the intenseargument of committing Voluntary Euthanasia is discussed.The main patch of the play, wad Harrison, once an imaginative, devotedsculptor, is involved in a terrible car crash. Following a longoperation, Ken is paralyzed from the neck down he is informed that hemay never be able to move his body ever again. Brian Clark in a similar way uses different characters to visual aspect adifferent view of Kens possibilities. Dr. Emerson thinks Kens lifeis precious and should be kept at any cost, no matter what Kenswishes are. Dr. Scott also wants Ken to stay animate but values Kensopinion and thoughts more than Dr. Emerson, she thinks sympathy a lot.Dr. Travers shows a view on Kens problem, he sees it the same way asDr. Emerson, and thinks of it as a mental patient wanting to commitsuicide, and is happy to back up Dr. Emerson in a court of law, andalso sees it as doing a favor for Dr. Emerson, no matter what he findswhilst talking to Ken. In order to make the play more dramatic the debate further Brian Clarkuses a dramatic point. The point is that to begin with Ken suffered hisaccident he was happy and wanted to go on living, but at that timepeople get worded to him and he could have argued a point and peoplewould have listened to it. Now that Ken finds himself in a situationwhere he doesnt want to go on living, few people want to listen tohim Only my brain functions unimpaired but even that is futilebecause I cant act on any conclusions it comes to.... ...uthanasia isbecoming his ending. The lights out at the end of the playrepresents kens decision to follow euthanasia if the light would havebeen left on then he may have decided to live.Euthanasia should not be made legal because it will be easily misusedunnecessarily. Eu thanasia would not only be for people who areterminally ill, it will wrick non-voluntary. I also believe thatEuthanasia is a rejection of the importance and value of human life.Emotional and psychological pressures could become overpowering fordepressed or qualified people. If the choice of euthanasia isconsidered as good as a decision to receive care, loads of people willfeel guilty for not choosing death. monetary considerations, added tothe concern about being a burden could serve as powerful forces thatwould lead a person to choose euthanasia or help suicide.